What Is A Registered Patent Agent
A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific genetic sequence given by a authorities to the individual or corporation who claims to have first identified that cistron segment. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having "sole buying" of genetic testing for patented genes.Simply what if Big Pharma's patented viral mRNA genetic sequence vaccine is now merged with your own Deoxyribonucleic acid? Are you at present holding of Big Pharma?
On June 13, 2013, in the case of theAssociation for Molecular Pathology 5. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Courtroom of the United States ruled that"man genes" cannot be patented in the U.Due south. considering DNA is a"product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, and then patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 homo genes were patented. The Supreme Courtroom'southward decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing.
The Supreme Court's ruling did permit"that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented considering DNA sequences altered past humans are not establish in nature."The Court specifically mentioned the power to patent a blazon of Dna known as "Complementary DNA" (cDNA). Free DNA (cDNA) is produced from mRNA genetic sequences within cells, that integrate with cellular Dna; the cells genetic genome.
The Judgement handed down past Justice Antonin Scalia, is at odds with science itself; the cDNA comments make little sense since it'due south difficult to distinguish betwixt "natural" Deoxyribonucleic acid and cDNA. It is not right to insist that cDNA is non a production of nature! In that location are several examples of cDNA in nature; Retroviruses such every bit HIV catechumen their RNA-based genomes into cDNA before they integrate into a host genome. So why this judgement in item? Why not dominion all types of human being cellular DNA natural and therefore unpatentable? Did Scalia have insight on what was coming down the line with viral mRNA vaccines? Was he aware of the NWO plan involving the mass vaccination of citizens with patented biological material?
Scalia once told students and staff at a faculty tiffin, that internment camps could happen again:
"Only you are kidding yourself if you remember the same thing volition not happen over again," Scalia cited a Latin expression pregnant, "In times of war, the laws fall silent."
Many believe viral mRNA vaccines have the ability to comprise themselves into host Dna or the cellular genome. Despite assurances from Government, medical government, the CDC, the WHO and the Pharmaceuticals themselves who have repeatedly stated all viral RNA is destroyed by the torso mail-vaccination, in a postmortem report of a patient who had been vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, viral RNA was found in all his body cells and at that place was no evidence what-so-ever that he was infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus!But was this viral RNA genetic material located within the nucleus of the prison cell where the human Dna is stored?If so did the viral genetic sequence merge with the host DNA?
The First Victim of the COVID-nineteen Vaccine: Patient dies from Antibiotic-Dependent Enhancement!
Recently, a team of prominent scientists published a controversial hypothesis that genetic material of the pandemic coronavirus can integrate into our chromosomes (DNA) and stick effectually long after the infection is over. If they are right these viral insertions could explain the rare finding that people can recover from COVID-nineteen simply then examination positive for SARS-CoV-2 again months later. The researchers emphasized thatviral integration did non mean people who recovered from COVID-nineteen remain infectious. The authors were able to demonstrate that the SARS-CoV-2 viral sequence can be copied by an enzyme in human cells into DNA and and so insert them into our chromosomes. Critics of this research charged them with stoking unfounded fears that COVID-19 vaccines based on messenger RNA (mRNA) might somehow alter human DNA. The evidence suggests that this is indeed possible!
Viral Vector mRNA vaccines such equally AstraZeneca and Pfizer'due south & Moderna's mRNA vaccines all have the capacity of"genomic integration" with host Deoxyribonucleic acid. Both employviral mRNA segments that code for"spike protein" and operate on a similar delivery principle; AstraZeneca's viral vector vaccine uses a weakened virus devoid of genetic material (called a vector) to deliverviral mRNA into human cells thereby initiating an immune response, whereas in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, the delivery of theviral mRNAsegment is done using lipid nanoparticles. It is clearly stated in this tabular array fromSinobiologicals, a pharmaceutical company also producing vaccines, that ane of the disadvantages with viral vector (mRNA) vaccines is the"Possible genomic integration of strange Deoxyribonucleic acid"; simply put, viral genetic textile can integrate with the genetic fabric of the host itself…. your DNA! We believe that the lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery system used by Pfizer and Moderna would too cause a similar problem!After all, viral mRNA is viral mRNA… is viral mRNA!
Here is a short video explaining how the different vaccines work. At the ii infinitesimal mark, the video introduces viral vector mRNA vaccines (AstraZeneca) and mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Note: They both deliver mRNA vaccines.Odd how NO I fifty-fifty mentions viral mRNA when they talk nigh AstraZeneca?
Now should theviral mRNA vaccine incorporate it'south viral genome into your Deoxyribonucleic acid a precedent has already been set and your "tainted" DNA is now considered a biological patent of the Pharmaceutical Company that provided you with the vaccine! Does this means that everyone who has had the vaccine in now technically endemic and volition be divers equally "Trans-man" or "Transgenic"? And equally such, practice "Transgenic" individuals have rights under the law?
The thought that advances in molecular genetics would put man individuals or parts of their bodies under someone else'south control has been stirring emotions and terrifying people. Information technology was this notion of "patenting humans" that mobilized members of Congress to pass legislation prohibiting the issuance of patent claims "directed to or encompassing a man organism." The values underlying this legislation was amusing, yet its execution was deeply flawed and the potential outcomes, chancy. The legislation's numerous flaws include primarily, the lack of an agreed-upon definition of "man organism."
The idea of "patenting humans" tends to evoke images of helpless fellow humans "tagged" with patent numbers who are the property of someone, mayhap a heartless regime or corporate entity. Many believe that patents convey property rights on "human organisms" which would permit the right to sell, offer for sale, brand, employ, and import such "human organisms." On the moral forepart, critics are concerned with the potential to erode man dignity and "play God." The thing is… all of this is true!
The U.S. Congress responded to the moral concerns with the America Invents Act (AIA); passed by Congress and was signed into police past Rothschild's puppet, President Barack Obama on September sixteen, 2011. Section 33 of the AIA states that "notwithstanding any other provision of police, no patent may effect on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism." This provision was intended to ban the patenting of "human beings" at any stage of development, including embryos, fetuses, human being/non-human chimeras, and clones. However, the vague wording of section 33 and the absenteeism of a definition for "man organism," volition give courts wide breadth when interpreting department 33; whereas "homo beings" would accept had more of a legal continuing the term "human organism" has placed mankind at the same level of an amoeba!
The language of section 33 was originally proposed by Representative David Weldon in 2003 every bit an amendment to the Commerce-Justice-State Appropriations Beak. Responding to criticism from lobbyist groups opposing the amendment, Weldon said it was "absurd" that "patents on stem cell lines, procedures for creating man embryos, prosthetic devices, and . . . any drug or product that might be used in or for human beings would be affected by the amendment. He argued before Congress that his amendment did zip more than provide congressional backing for the USPTO'southward (The United States Patent and Trademark Office is an agency in the U.S. Section of Commerce that issues patents) policy against patenting human beings. Why did Weldon non define "man beings" in the Bill? The human was a distinguished medical doctor and scientist? He knew there was definitely a difference between "homo being" and "man organism"; i is Divine whereas the other is a laboratory examination animal? Could it be his Jesuit upbringing or the freemason undercover societies he was involved with like Phi Beta Kapa?
The Weldon amendment applies to patents on claims directed to or encompassing a "human organism" at any phase of development and includes: a human embryo, fetus, infant, kid, boyish, or adult, regardless of whether the organism was produced by technological methods. This subpoena applies to patents on "man organisms" and as such these "human organism" are Non patentable under the law. The term ''man organism'' includes an organism of the man species that has incorporated one or more genes taken from a nonhuman organism (i.due east. viral genetic material). For those that accept been vaccinated with viral mRNA and have viral genomic inserts in their DNA, they would be considered a "human organism," and as such tin can not exist patented. All the same some legal experts say that this is entirely possible and all those containing biologically patented genes can indeed be patented! Wonder if "you are now the property of…" that was included in the small-print on the vaccine medication package insert? Oh snap… there weren't any inserts!
Human Rights laws specifically state that "human beings" are born human being and as such take rights under the law. For a "man organism" who was human at nascency and with "man rights" this definition holds true. Withal, their "genetically modified offspring" will technically exist born as "not-human" or "transgenic" since their cistron pool has been tarnished with viral genetic material! And as "non-humans" they are thus patentable! Congratulations on taking the jab! Your children and future generations volition at present be considered the biological patents of Pharmaceutical Companies! In perpetuity!
2013, The The states Supreme Court Case:Pathology five Myriad Genetics, Inc. "People who are legally identified equally "transhuman" do not accept access to homo rights or rights granted by the state. This is considering they are non classified as 100% biological or human."
Vaccinated will exist considered "Human Organisms" The UN has already defined "Human" as having a "Human being genome" and thus worthy of "Human Rights".
What the NWO did with these vaccines is not but diabolical only too far-reaching. It will not end with humans being vaccinated confronting COVID-19. Autonomy is lost in genetically modified embryos and children born to vaccinated parents, who are deemed "transgenic". Every bit such they no longer accept rights under these patent laws. Should there be long-term wellness complications from these vaccines a state may enact laws allowing for the legalization of mandatory abortions, sterilization and fifty-fifty… euthanasia! Eugenics is how Hitler's Nazi Germany dealt with the "genetically unfit" and for that thing, adults and the elderly were included in their decease panels. This is the NWO depopulation agenda; if the jab doesn't kill yous, they will!
Furthermore, if a "transgenic" organism were patented, the patent owner would have a right to prevent others from interacting with the patented "transgenic" besides equally having the right to constrain the deportment or free will of the "transgenic." The transgenic would become holding of the patent holder and could exist transferred to some other person through a auction of the patent. Whether a "transgenic" is property under the command of others will affect the likelihood and extent of experimentation performed upon information technology: because an owner demand not ask property for its consent! The patent rights over humans would be equivalent to slavery!
In drawing this line between naturally occurring Dna and cDNA, were the courts trying to encourage innovation within the manufacture? Or were they already aware at the fourth dimension, that viral mRNA vaccines could exist integrated into the man genome thus making individuals biological patents of Corporations? All premeditated and pre-planned for their "Plandemic"!
Transhumanism Is Eugenics Today
Continued Reading:
Source: https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/07/08/big-pharma-mrna-vaccine-will-be-used-to-patent-humans/
Posted by: moselydocits.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Is A Registered Patent Agent"
Post a Comment